3 days ago
American magazine The Atlantic has released a series of purported messages that allegedly showed Pete Hegseth providing classified information regarding the timing of US warplane launches and bomb deployments.
Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth dismissed the credibility of The Atlantic's reporting. (File photo: Reuters)
New Delhi,UPDATED: Mar 27, 2025 07:27 IST
Hours after The Atlantic published what it claimed to be a leaked Signal chat involving senior US national security officials discussing an attack on the Houthis in Yemen, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth strongly refuted the allegations, labeling them as 'hoaxes'.
On Wednesday, The Atlantic released a series of purported messages that allegedly showed Hegseth providing classified information regarding the timing of US warplane launches and bomb deployments.
According to the American magazine, these details were shared even before American forces were airborne for the March 15 strike against Houthi targets in Yemen.
Reacting to the report, Hegseth issued a scathing rebuttal, questioning the credibility of the reported communications.
“So, let me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called 'war plans', and those 'plans' include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information," Hegseth said in a post on X.
"Those are some really shitty war plans," he said.
Hegseth further dismissed the credibility of The Atlantic's reporting, suggesting that the magazine's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, lacked experience in assessing real military strategies. "This only proves one thing: Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an ‘attack plan’ (as he now calls it). Not even close," he wrote.
Published By:
Sahil Sinha
Published On:
Mar 27, 2025
