1 hour ago
Pat Conaghan and Andrew Wallace cross the floor on gambling bill
Two Coalition MPs have crossed the floor to protest against the gambling bill and the amendments agreed to by the government and Coalition.
s MP Pat Conaghan is surrounded by independents including Andrew Wilkie, Helen Haines, Monique Ryan and Allegra Spender.
Andrew Wallace has also crossed the floor but is sitting alone.
Earlier, Zali Steggall criticised the government for not releasing the full details of the amendment earlier, asking how the crossbench were supposed to vote on them with just a few minutes’ notice. She, like the other independents, is voting against the bill’s amendments.
Key events
‘I got it wrong’: Keogh apologises after refusing to meet with veterans
The veterans’ affairs minister, Matt Keogh, had yesterday initially refused to meet with a group of veterans concerned about a cap on allied health services.
After political pressure, he caved.
The shadow minister, Michael McCormack says former Air Force fighter jet pilot Dr Tim Nelson described the meeting today like this: “He walked into the room, refused to shake our hand, sat down with his arms crossed and rolled his eyes.” He asks Keogh if he will “apologise for disrespecting veterans by rolling his eyes at Australian heroes?”
Keogh admits that he made the wrong decision to initially reject the meeting, but says the description of the meeting is wrong.
I acknowledge that I got it wrong in not agreeing to meet with them last week when that initial request came in. I own that. I met with them and I heard them last night. When I came into the room, I said to them, relax, I want to hear what you want to tell me. I don’t agree with the characterisation you have outlined and I shook the hands of the people as we finished the meeting, to be clear.
O’Neil says there will be ‘a lot of politics’ on renting
The shadow treasurer, Tim Wilson, is up at the despatch box next and asks the government why, on their watch, “median capital city rents have soared from $470 per week to $690 per week”.
From a quick Google, according to Domain’s March 2022 quarter report, the median unit price for combined capital cities was $460 per week, which rose to $680 per by the June 2026 quarter.
The housing minister, Clare O’Neil, like the PM, says that anyone who owned a property on budget night can still negatively gear it, and that the changes should mean more renters become buyers.
75,000 renters will get that opportunity and more renters, we’re building more homes for renters. There’s going to be a lot of politics about this debate. The fact that the Liberal party of Australia is expecting us to believe they care about renters is telling us about the politics here.
Helps to have a ‘leg to stand on’, Clare O’Neil says, as Coalition targets housing minister
Is the housing minister “damn proud” of rising rents, asks the Liberal frontbencher Angie Bell, after Clare O’Neil yesterday said she was “damn proud” of the budget changes to get more young people into housing.
O’Neil thanks her for the broad question and says she’ll go back to “basics”, that the housing crisis has been brewing in this country for 40 years.
After a couple of minutes, Dan Tehan calls it and concedes that yes, the question was kinda broad but O’Neil hasn’t once mentioned rents in her answer. Tehan says he’s just trying to be helpful, which gets a good laugh from the benches.
Milton Dick says the question was really broad and that O’Neil is being relevant.
O’Neil continues and takes a jab at the opposition:
I’d just say to those opposite it helps when you come to the despatch box on questions like this to have a leg to stand on and I just remind those opposite that they had nine years in office. They did not raise commonwealth rent assistance once in the time that they were in office. They didn’t do anything about rental standards.
Albanese tested on reports of rising rents
Angus Taylor is back and asks the prime minister to guarantee that rents won’t go up by 30%, after media reports quoting NAB, which warned the tax changes to negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount could see rents soar.
Anthony Albanese says NAB has since clarified its position, stating that “this was not a forecast and it’s important to note that we do not forecast rental yields”.
He adds that anyone who already owned a property up until budget night could still negatively gear that property now.
Taylor stands up to make a point of order on relevance because he wants the PM to provide a guarantee that rents won’t go up 30%, but Milton Dick says so far Albanese has been relevant.
Albanese continues and says that The Australian newspaper, which published the report, might issue a clarification tomorrow on their story. He then ends, saying:
I haven’t heard one person – perhaps the leader of the opposition might be the one – who thinks that the housing system is working. None. None. It is a broken housing system that we inherited and we’re fixing it, to give young people a fair time.
Question time begins
It’s question time!
Angus Taylor starts on the widow tax, asking why it took the government 98 days after the budget to come to its senses and “do the right thing” to scrap the tax.
Anthony Albanese argues that the draft legislation has been out for consultation for a couple of weeks already.
We had, in that context, made it very clear that we would introduce legislation to deal with this issue. And during the debate about tax, Mr Speaker, those opposite have complained about a lack of consultation up to this point. They’ve said that what we should have done is to flag taxes before the budget, which would have, of course … meant there was a potential for windfall gains.
Marles hints at talks for Japan to use Australia’s missile ranges for tests
The Defence minister, Richard Marles, and his Japanese counterpart, Shinjirō Koizumi, have met in Canberra today and held a short press conference afterward.
Marles says that talks are progressing between the two nations which could see Japan use Australia’s missile ranges over the next decade.
We have agreed to progress a better and enhanced arrangement between Australia and Japan for Japan’s use of our missile ranges over the next decade across a range of missile capabilities, including Japan’s hypersonic missile program.
Marles also says the first Mogami-class frigate being acquired by Australia from Japan is expected to be in service this decade.
Read more:
‘We’ve lost the plot’ on gambling in Australia: Wallace
The Liberal MP Andrew Wallace has, for the first time, crossed the floor to vote against the gambling reforms agreed to by the Coalition and Labor.
He has already crossed the floor on the amendments, and says he’ll cross the floor to vote against the entire bill.
He tells News24 he wanted to see more block-out periods for gambling ads on broadcast television and stronger action on inducements.
I think that we have this unholy alliance between sport and gambling, where young kids are being preyed upon. I wanted to see much greater time frames, where there were bans on gambling ads, I wanted to see an hour before, no ads during, an hour afterwards, and not just on live sport but on replayed sport as well. I wanted to see an opt-in approach for inducements.
And in all good conscience, these reforms don’t go anywhere near enough to correcting those bad elements. We’re putting too much faith in the hands of the gambling companies. And quite frankly, they have not demonstrated that they deserve that faith.
We’ve lost the plot, $36bn a year we’re losing.
In pics: The House votes on gambling reforms
Crossbenchers and experts slam gambling changes: ‘You can’t opt-out of the internet’
Josh Butler
Crossbenchers and gambling harm advocates have slammed the deal to pass the wagering legislation. The Greens called it “cowardly and careless”, while David Pocock has also said it doesn’t go nearly far enough.
“This major party stitch-up will see Australians continue to be bombarded by gambling ads online and hundreds of thousands of vulnerable people exposed to devastating gambling harm,” the Greens said. Party leader Larissa Waters:
Anthony Albanese and the entire Labor party should hang their heads in shame today. Our prime minister has handed Australian screens over to predatory gambling companies.
The independent MP Andrew Wilkie said it was a “national day of shame”, rubbishing the Liberal-Labor amendments as “minor tweaks and piecemeal”.
It won’t protect children. It won’t break the nexus between gambling and sport. It won’t stop the suicides.
The evidence on gambling harm has been overwhelming for years. We know what works. We know what the community wants. We know the recommendations that need to be implemented. What has been lacking is political courage.
Kate Seselja, co-chair of the Gambling Harm Lived Experience Experts, said in a statement that the government should instead follow the recommendations of Peta Murphy’s landmark report which called for a full ban on online gambling advertisements.
“The only way to effectively block gambling ads is to ban them in Australia. This proposal is completely unworkable,” Seselja said of the government’s new proposal for a universal “opt-out” register for ads.
You can’t ‘opt out’ of the internet. The prime minister’s duty of care is to the people of Australia, not to the gambling, media, or sports industries.
Pat Conaghan and Andrew Wallace cross the floor on gambling bill
Two Coalition MPs have crossed the floor to protest against the gambling bill and the amendments agreed to by the government and Coalition.
s MP Pat Conaghan is surrounded by independents including Andrew Wilkie, Helen Haines, Monique Ryan and Allegra Spender.
Andrew Wallace has also crossed the floor but is sitting alone.
Earlier, Zali Steggall criticised the government for not releasing the full details of the amendment earlier, asking how the crossbench were supposed to vote on them with just a few minutes’ notice. She, like the other independents, is voting against the bill’s amendments.
McLachlan, Scarr and Conaghan reserve the right to cross the floor on gambling
Two Liberal senators and one s MP have reserved the right to cross the floor on the gambling legislation – that is, go against the Coalition’s vote for the changes – arguing the reforms don’t go far enough.
They are senators Andrew McLachlan, Paul Scarr and Pat Conaghan.
Conaghan has made his frustrations over the bill well known in recent days, telling reporters this morning he thought the changes were too “weak”. He was the deputy chair of the parliamentary inquiry led by the late Labor MP Peta Murphy that released the “you win some, you lose more” report.
The House of Representatives is about to begin voting on the amendments agreed to between the Coalition and Labor.
Before the vote, the prime minister, Anthony Albanese speaks:
I want to thank the parliament for coming together to deal with this issue and get a result that will work … this legislation concentrates on those who need our help the most, people at most risk of harm.
He says the changes will ban gambling ads being broadcast 15 minutes before sporting games, as well as stop gambling ads on jerseys.
It will allow people who want to opt-out of gambling ads to do so more easily, through a simple gambling ad register. Ad-stop to back up the previous bet-stop.
What is the ‘widow tax’ loophole the government and Coalition are teaming up to scrap?
Achol Arok
The so-called “widow tax” is an unintended consequence of the government’s changes to negative gearing, which the government and Coalition are now working to scrap.
Under the reforms announced in the May budget, negative gearing on established homes bought after budget night was restricted, while properties bought before 12 May were protected under grandfathering arrangements.
However, the new laws would apply to a person who inherited their partner’s share of a property after their death or as part of a divorce settlement – that is, they would lose the grandfathered negative gearing arrangements – leading to the loophole being dubbed a “widow tax”.
As a result, Labor has proposed amendments to prevent a partner whose spouse has died, or someone who has inherited a property, from being on the hook for the new tax treatment.
The government had already agreed to close the loophole in future legislation. But the opposition demanded it act more quickly in return for support on other bills.
If you’re sitting in Parliament House right now I hope you like the sound of bells …
Because there are about 50 million amendments to the government’s NDIS legislation.
Before we can even get to the substantive amendments to the bill, there are a bunch of amendments to the motion for the “second reading” of the bill.
The second reading is where the bill as a whole is debated, and second reading amendments basically allow other parties to protest parts of the legislation or criticise the government before the formal debate begins.
For example, the opposition has put forward a second reading amendment, noting that the government was previously “unable to achieve” the target NDIS growth rate of 8% and subsequently “failed” to achieve a second growth rate target of 5-6%.
Senator Lidia Thorpe’s amendment to the second reading states that there was inadequate consultation on the bill with First Nations people and that the bill “will disproportionately and severely harm and breach the human rights of First People with disability”.
After that there are so far 23 amendments to the bill itself listed from the Greens and David Pocock – and more could well be added later.
Government pushes for Senate to vote on NDIS today
Over in the Senate, the government is moving to guillotine debate on four key bills to get them through this week.
Labor is proposing to debate and vote on the NDIS reforms tonight then bring on the widow tax legislation first thing tomorrow morning. The government agreed to the Coalition’s demand to immediately bring on the “widow tax” debate in exchange for support on the NDIS bill.
Labor is proposing for the gambling bill to also be debated and voted on tomorrow, after it passes the House of Representatives tonight.
On Thursday, the Senate will debate and then vote on the news bargaining incentive bill which also has been negotiated with the Coalition.
All of this means is that there’ll be a hard out time on all debate for the Senate to then vote on each of those bills and all the amendments.
The Greens, David Pocock and One Nation are voting against the guillotine motion.
Josh Butler
Clive Palmer changing party name, once again
Clive Palmer wants to change the name of his political party, again.
Documents published by the Australian Electoral Commission reveal an application to change the name of the United Australia Party to Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party. The party logo is also mooted for a change.
It currently features a map of Australia inside a circle, with the words “United Australia Party” at the top and “save Australia” underneath; the new proposal is to change that to read “Clive Palmer’s” at the top and “United Australia Party” below.
The AEC, as part of normal processes, is notifying of the change and taking feedback until mid-September.
Tom McIlroy
Opposition pushes for Bondi royal commission extension over ‘unfinished business’
Liberal MPs are seeking to suspend standing orders in federal parliament to call on the government to extend the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion.
Launched in the wake of the Bondi beach shootings in December, the royal commission has entered its final block of hearings with its final report due to be presented to the government by 14 December.
Julian Leeser, one of the highest-profile Jewish members of parliament, has told the House of Representatives the commission’s 12-month timetable has imposed “severe constraints” on its capacity to investigate the causes, perpetrators and enablers of antisemitism in Australia.
He believes many significant voices will be left unheard on the current timeline, including leaders of arts and cultural institutions, public service chiefs, university bosses, protest organisations and the Australian Human Rights Commission.
“The royal commission is, for many Australians, the only chance we will have as a nation to properly expose and address the antisemitism that has become so prevalent in this country and which diminishes us all,” Leeser said.
But it is a royal commission that finishes in a matter of days, and as it stands, it is a royal commission with unfinished business.
The window to debate the issue is closing. These issues deserve to be heard, and urgently.
The government is expected to vote it down.
