Can India rely on America for F-35 fighter jets? 

UPDATED: Mar 16, 2025 23:04 IST

The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, a fifth-generation stealth multirole fighter, has become a focal point of international debate. Concerns are mounting that the United States could potentially leverage its control over the aircraft's sophisticated systems to influence the defence capabilities of allied nations.

Portugal's shift in defence procurement

Portugal has recently reconsidered its plan to replace its aging F-16 fleet with F-35s. The country's Defence Minister Nuno Melo highlighted the need to evaluate the geopolitical environment in defence acquisitions, referencing the US's recent stance towards NATO and military matters. This decision underscores the complexities nations face when balancing defence needs with geopolitical considerations.

Canada's reassessment of the F-35 deal

Canada is also reexamining its commitment to purchase 88 F-35s from Lockheed Martin, a deal valued at approximately C$19 billion. Defence minister Bill Blair indicated that the government is exploring alternatives, including domestic assembly options, to ensure alignment with Canada's defence requirements amidst evolving geopolitical and economic conditions.

The 'Kill Switch' controversy

A significant concern among European nations is the potential existence of a 'kill switch' a mechanism that could allow the US to remotely disable or limit the functionality of F-35s sold to allies. While such a feature physically does not exist, the aircraft's reliance on US software, parts, and logistical support means that withholding these could effectively ground the jets. This dependency raises questions about operational sovereignty for countries operating the F-35.

Implications for European Defence autonomy

The broader issue at hand is Europe's strategic autonomy in defence. The reliance on US-made military equipment, such as the F-35, could pose vulnerabilities if geopolitical relations shift. Developing indigenous defence capabilities is increasingly viewed as essential to mitigate potential risks associated with external dependencies.

Conclusion

The debates surrounding the F-35 highlight the intricate balance nations must strike between acquiring advanced military technology and maintaining sovereign control over their defence assets. As geopolitical landscapes evolve, countries like Portugal and Canada are reevaluating their defence procurement strategies to ensure they align with national interests and security imperatives.