Georgia judge halts hand count rule for ballots, blocking Trump-backed effort

1 month ago

A Georgia judge has temporarily halted a new rule requiring poll workers to hand count ballots in the upcoming election, dealing a blow to Donald Trump and his Republican allies. The rule, aimed at introducing more transparency, has been criticised for potentially causing chaos and delaying results.

US voting

The hand-count rule was passed on September 20 by a pro-Trump conservative majority of Georgia's election board. (Photo: AP)

Reuters

UPDATED: Oct 16, 2024 15:03 IST

A Georgia judge on Tuesday temporarily halted a new rule requiring poll workers to hand count ballots in the November 5 election, in a defeat for Donald Trump, whose Republican allies pushed the change after he lost the battleground state in 2020.

The hand-count rule was passed on September 20 by a pro-Trump conservative majority of Georgia's election board, who said they were attempting to make the November 5 election more secure and transparent.

Democrats had said the change would sow chaos and delay results.

Georgia, where early voting began in record numbers on Tuesday, is one of seven states likely to determine the presidential contest between Trump and his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris. In 2020, Trump made false claims of widespread voting fraud in the state.

Judge Robert McBurney said in his decision on Tuesday that it was appropriate to pause the vote counting rule because it introduced fresh uncertainty into the process just weeks before Election Day.

"Anything that adds uncertainty and disorder to the electoral process disserves the public," according to a copy of the decision posted by Democracy Docket, a website founded by Democratic lawyer Marc Elias that tracks election cases.

"The administrative chaos that will - not may - ensue is entirely inconsistent with the obligations of our boards of elections (and the State Election Board) to ensure that our elections are fair, legal, and orderly," the judge wrote.

Representatives of the Georgia State Election Board and Republican Committee did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

The judge did not say the rule was illegal but that it was appropriate to pause it pending further review. An appeals court could potentially reverse the decision.

The decision was not immediately available on the court's online docket on Tuesday night.

Democrats hailed McBurney's ruling as a win for voters.

"From the beginning, this rule was an effort to delay election results to sow doubt in the outcome, and our democracy is stronger thanks to this decision to block it," party officials said in a statement provided by the Harris campaign.

'OPPORTUNITY FOR ERROR'

The lawsuit was filed on October 2 by Cobb County Board of Elections and Registration and joined by the Democratic Committee, which intervened in the case.

Also on Tuesday, McBurney ruled in a separate case that local election officials in Georgia are required to certify results, rejecting an argument that counties could refuse to do so if they had concerns about the voting process.

The hand-count rule would require three poll workers in each of the state's more than 6,500 precincts to open the sealed boxes of ballots scanned by machines and conduct a hand count, starting as soon as election night.

Voting rights groups had said the rule could allow rogue county election board members to delay or deny certification of election results, throwing the state's vote into chaos, while the state attorney general's office warned the board was likely exceeding its statutory authority.

The board's 3-2 vote was pushed through by three allies of Trump.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, the state's top election official, said ahead of the Sept. 20 meeting during which the rule was passed that it would introduce "the opportunity for error, lost or stolen ballots, and fraud."

Janelle King, a Republican member of the elections board, said during the meeting that the hand count was needed to ensure accuracy, even if that meant results would be delayed.

"What I don’t want to do is set a precedent that we are okay with speed over accuracy," King said.

There is pending litigation over other changes by the board, including rules empowering local officials to investigate discrepancies in vote totals and conduct "reasonable enquiries" into irregularities before certifying the results.

Trump faces criminal charges accusing him of pressuring Georgia officials to reverse his 2020 election loss, though he denies wrongdoing. He has pleaded not guilty.

Published By:

Girish Kumar Anshul

Published On:

Oct 16, 2024

Read Full Article at Source